THE BRISTLE MILLIPEDES (DIPLOPODA, PENICILLATA, POLYXENIDA) OF THE IBERIAN PENINSULA, BALEARIC AND CANARY ISLANDS WITH NEW RECORDS AND DATA ON THEIR DISTRIBUTION
Abstract
Polyxenida, commonly known as bristly or pincushion millipedes, is a small order of millipedes, usually found in dead wood, under bark on dead logs and living trees and scrubs, in soil, leaf litter and under rocks. Given their small size and elusive nature, they have been frequently overlooked, and available information of most species is very limited. Their distribution and diversity in most regions of the Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands are still largely unknown. Here we compile both published and new records for Polyxenida species in these three geographical areas. We also present pictures of living specimens of several species. In the studied regions there are representatives of three families, 5 genera and at least 10 species. In the family Synxenidae, only one species, Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas, 1846), occurs on in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. The Polyxenidae is more diverse: Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) is widespread in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands, where there could be yet another species of Polyxenus Latreille, 1804; in the Canary Islands there is a possibly introduced widespread species, P. fasciculatus Say, 1821, and one endemic, P. oromii Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996; the genus Macroxenus Brolemann, 1917 is represented by M. rubromarginatus (Lucas, 1846) in the Iberian Peninsula and M. enghoffi Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996, probably another endemic species, in the Canary Islands. Finally, in the family Lophoproctidae we find Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann, 1910) both on the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands; L. lucidus (Chalande, 1888), reported here for the first time from the Iberian Peninsula and El Hierro Island; L. pagesi Condè, 1981, endemic to caves in Mallorca, with a closely related form, L. cf. pagesi also from caves in Portugal; Lophoproctinus inferus inferus (Silvestri, 1903), with a few records from Mallorca, and L. i. maurus Marquet & Condè, 1950, known from the Canary Islands. Our new records, as well as those from the citizen science initiative iNaturalist, notably expand the known distribution ranges of several Polyxenida species in the Iberian Peninsula. Many species show very fragmented distribution patterns, with isolated records in different geographical areas. Further study including more intensive sampling and molecular data will help to understand the true nature of such patterns.
Keywords: Bristly millipedes; new records; Iberian Peninsula; Balearic Islands; Canary Islands; Polyxenidae; Lophoproctidae; Synxenidae.
Resumen
Los polixénidos (Diplopoda, Penicillata, Polyxenida) de la península Ibérica, Baleares y Canarias con nuevos registros y datos sobre su distribución
Polyxenida es un orden pequeño de milpiés que usualmente se encuentran en el suelo, madera muerta, bajo cortezas de troncos muertos o de árboles y arbustos vivos, en hojarasca y debajo de rocas. Dado su pequeño tamaño y su naturaleza elusiva, se han estudiado poco, de modo que el conocimiento sobre la distribución, diversidad, biología e historia natural de las especies ibéricas, baleares y canarias es muy limitado. En este trabajo recopilamos todos los registros publicados y proporcionamos nuevas citas para las áreas mencionadas. También incluimos fotos en vivo de varias especies ibéricas previamente no fotografiadas. En las regiones de estudio se encuentran representantes de 3 familias, 5 géneros y al menos 10 especies. La familia Synxenidae incluye un solo representante, Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas, 1846), en la península Ibérica y en las islas Baleares. La diversidad es más alta para Polyxenidae, con una especie de amplia distribución, Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758), en Iberia y también Baleares, en donde podría haber otra especie del género no descrita; en las Canarias está presente otra especie de amplia distribución, P. fasciculatus Say, 1821, y el endemismo P. oromii Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996; el género Macroxenus Brolemann, 1917 está representado por M. rubromarginatus (Lucas, 1846) en Iberia, y M. enghoffi Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996, posiblemente endémica de las Canarias. Finalmente, en la familia Lophoproctidae, Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann, 1910) se encuentra tanto en la península como en Baleares; L. lucidus (Chalande, 1888) es registrado por primera vez en la península ibérica y en la isla del Hierro; L. pagesi Condè, 1981 es endémico de cuevas de Mallorca, con una forma relacionada en cuevas de Portugal, L. cf. pagesi; Lophoproctinus inferus inferus (Silvestri, 1903) está presente con unos pocos registros en Mallorca y L. i. maurus Marquet & Condè, 1950 se encuentra en las Canarias. Nuestros nuevos registros junto con registros procedentes de iniciativas de ciencia ciudadana (iNaturalist), expanden notablemente el área de distribución conocida de varias especies de Polyxenida en la península Ibérica. Muchas de estas especies presentan patrones de distribución fragmentados, con registros aislados en diferentes áreas geográficas. Un estudio más intenso incluyendo muestreo exhaustivo y datos moleculares ayudará a entender mejor la naturaleza real de estos patrones de distribución.
Palabras clave: Polixénidos; nuevos registros; península ibérica; islas Baleares; islas Canarias; Polyxenidae; Lophoproctidae; Synxenidae.
Introduction[Up]
The order Polyxenida, commonly known as bristly or pincushion millipedes, includes tiny millipedes with a body length of usually less than 5 mm, characterised by an uncalcified cuticle and especially by the presence of tufts of trichomes on both the head and body segments (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin & Geoffroy, 2003) (Fig. 1). With little over 150 extant and a few fossil species preserved in Cretaceous amber, Polyxenida is one of the smallest orders among the Diplopoda (Edgecombe, 2015; Short, 2015a). Its phylogenetic placement makes it the sister lineage to Chilognatha, a sub-class that includes all other extant millipede order (Benavides et al., 2023). They are known as bark-dwelling millipedes (Hopkin & Read, 1992), as they are often found under the bark of dead wood or of living trees and scrubs, but they also live in soil and leaf litter, under stones, in rock crevices, in ant nests, bird nests, epiphytic plants and even in caves (Donisthorpe, 1927; Condè, 1981; Ishii & Yamaoka, 1982; Miquel et al., 2000; Tajovský et al., 2001; Stoev & Lapeva-Gjonova, 2005; Alexander, 2006; Cardoso et al. 2008; Whitaker & Ruckdeschel, 2010).
Given the often elusive nature of these animals and their small size, they are frequently overlooked. The first report of this group in the Iberian Peninsula was by Silvestri (1923), who cited Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas, 1846) from two localities in Girona and Tarragona. Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) was not recorded until 1946, when Machado published the first Polyxenida records from northern Portugal (Machado, 1946). The first Iberian Lophoproctidae, a population of Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann, 1910) from Barcelona, was mentioned by Condè (1954a). In the Balearic Islands, the first records were those of Condè (1954a), who reported three species of Polyxenidae and Lophoproctidae from Mallorca. In the Canary Islands, Polyxenida was thoroughly revised by Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin (1996), providing the first records of the order for the archipelago. Currently, the three recognized families of the order are present in the Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands (Melic, 2015), including one species of the familySynxenidae, five species of Polyxenidae and three species (one with two subspecies) of Lophoproctidae (Kime & Enghoff, 2011).
Our knowledge of the basic biology and general distribution of most species is still incomplete and largely unknown. For instance, in the Atlas of European Millipedes (Kime & Enghoff, 2011), the occurrence of Polyxenida is indicated in only 18 of the nearly 300 50 × 50 km2 UTM squares on the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands, most of them along the Mediterranean coast and the Pyrenees. Here we give an overview of the known distribution of the Iberian, Balearic, and Canarian Polyxenida, and present new distribution data for five species: Polyxenus lagurus, P. fasciculatus Say, 1821, Lophoproctus jeanneli, L. lucidus (Chalande, 1888) and Phryssonotus platycephalus, extending their known distribution to new areas in the studied regions.
Fig. 1.— Living specimens of some species of Polyxenida occurring in the Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands. A-B: Lophoproctus jeanneli, Girona, Lloret de Mar. C-E: Lophoproctus lucidus, C-D: Girona, Blanes, Cala St. Françesc, E: Albacete, Munera. F: Phryssonotus platycephalus, Girona, Blanes. G: Polyxenus fasciculatus, Tenerife, Mirador del Torreón. H: Polyxenus lagurus, Girona, Lloret de Mar. Pictures by PCRF.
Fig. 1.– Ejemplares vivos de algunas especies de Polyxenida presentes en la península ibérica, Baleares y Canarias. A-B: Lophoproctus jeanneli, Girona, Lloret de Mar. C-E: Lophoproctus lucidus, C-D: Girona, Blanes, Cala St. Françesc, E: Albacete, Munera. F: Phryssonotus platycephalus, Girona, Blanes. G: Polyxenus fasciculatus, Tenerife, Mirador del Torreón. H: Polyxenus lagurus, Girona, Lloret de Mar. Fotografías por PCRF.
Material and methods[Up]
We compiled all published records of Polyxenida in the Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands, and reviewed material newly collected in these geographic regions. Specimens were found by actively searching under stones, bark of dead trees and scrubs, logs, in the soil and in leaf litter, during several years of fieldwork from 2013 to 2018. Some specimens were collected and preserved in absolute ethanol for further identification under a microscope. This material is currently under study and will be deposited eventually at the Arthropoda collection at the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN).
We examined the specimens mounted in glycerine as temporary microscope preparations with a SWIFT SW350T compound microscope, and unmounted specimens with a Leica MZ16A stereo microscope, equipped with a Leica DFC550 camera used for photographing the specimens. Measurements and picture processing was done with LAS v4.3 software. Identifications were based on original descriptions and on published redescriptions and illustrations (e.g., Silvestri, 1923; Condè, 1968, 1989; Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1976, 1993; Vadell, 2010; Short, 2015b).
Maps were created in R using the packages ggplot 2 (ver. 3.4.0, see https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/; Kahle & Wickham, 2013), rnaturalearthdata (ver. 0.1.0, see https://cran.r-project.org/package=rnaturalearthdata; South & South, 2016) and gridExtra (ver. 2.3, see https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/index.html).
We also searched records from the citizen science project iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/; accessed on January 14, 2023).
Results[Up]
Considering published and new data, the diversity of Polyxenida in the Iberian Peninsula comprises a total of six species, including three Lophoproctidae (Lophoproctus jeanneli, Lophoproctus cf. pagesi Condè, 1981, and L. lucidus, the last mentioned reported here for the first time in the region), two Polyxenidae [Polyxenus lagurus and Macroxenus rubromarginatus (Lucas, 1846)] and one Synxenidae (Phryssonotus platycephalus) (Figs 2–4).
The Balearic Islands harbours populations of at least five species, one Synxenidae (Phryssonotus platycephalus), three Lophoproctidae [Lophoproctus pagesi, L. jeanneli and Lophoproctinus inferus inferus (Silvestri, 1903)] and one Polyxenidae (Polyxenus lagurus), although there could be at least one more species of Polyxenus Latreille, 1804 (see Condè, 1954a) (Figs 2–4).
Fig. 2.— Map showing published and unpublished records of Physsonotus platycephalus, Polyxenus lagurus, Polyxenus sp., and Macroxenus rubrimarginatus in the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic and Canary Islands.
Fig. 2.– Mapa que muestra los registros publicados e inéditos de Physsonotus platycephalus, Polyxenus lagurus, Polyxenus sp. y Macroxenus rubrimarginatus en la península ibérica, Islas Baleares y Canarias.
Fig. 3.— Map showing published and unpublished records of Lophoproctus jeanneli, Lophoproctus pagesi, Lophoproctus cf. pagesi, Polyxenus fasciculatus, Polyxenus oromii, and Macroxenus enghoffi in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands.
Fig. 3.– Mapa que muestra registros publicados y no publicados de Lophoproctus jeanneli, Lophoproctus pagesi, Lophoproctus cf. pagesi, Polyxenus fasciculatus, Polyxenus oromii y Macroxenus enghoffi en la península ibérica y Baleares.
In the Canary Islands there are two species of Lophoproctidae (Lophoproctus lucidus, reported here for the first time in the region, and Lophoproctinus inferus maurus Marquet & Condè, 1950) and three Polyxenidae (Polyxenus fasciculatus, P. oromii Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996 and Macroxenus enghoffi Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996) (Figs 3–4).
Fig. 4.— Map showing published and unpublished records of Lophoproctinus inferus inferus, Lophoproctinus inferus maurus and Lophoproctus lucidus in the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic, and Canary Islands.
Fig. 4.– Mapa que muestra los registros publicados y no publicados de Lophoproctinus inferus inferus, Lophoproctinus inferus maurus y Lophoproctus lucidus en la península ibérica, Baleares y Canarias.
Fig. 5.— Map showing observations of Iberian, Balearic, and Canarian Polyxenida from iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/).
Fig. 5.– Mapa que muestra las observaciones de Polyxenida ibéricos, baleares y canarios de iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/).
We found 55 records correctly identified as Polyxenida in iNaturalist, 53 from the Iberian Peninsula and two from Tenerife, Canary Islands (Fig. 5). Among the Iberian records, seven of them corresponded to Lophoproctidae and were tentatively identified as Lophoproctus Pocock, 1895. Identification at species level with the available pictures is not possible. However, two of them were tentatively, and likely wrongly, identified as Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1895, with no obvious justification (these specimens appear now as Lophoproctus). 39 samples were tentatively identified as Polyxenus, 13 of them as Polyxenus lagurus. The two records from Tenerife were identified as Polyxenus fasciculatus. Based on the available photographs, these specimens can be identified with certainty only to family level, either Lophoproctidae or Polyxenidae.
Checklist of the Iberian, Balearic, and Canarian Polyxenida
Family Synxenidae Silvestri, 1923
Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas, 1846) (Figs 1F, 2)
Polyxenus platycephalus Lucas, 1846: 283.
Synxenus platycephalus (Lucas): Silvestri, 1923: 9.
Koubanus platycephalus (Lucas): Attems, 1928: 198.
Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas): Condè, 1954b: 496.
General distribution. The species was originally described based on material from Kouba, Algeria (Lucas, 1846). It has been found at sparse, isolated points in the western Mediterranean, including Sicily, the Balearic Islands, and the Iberian Peninsula (Silvestri, 1923; Müller et al., 2007; Vadell, 2010; Jiménez-Valverde et al., 2015).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Girona: Lloret de Mar (Silvestri, 1923); Tarragona: montem “Montsià” ad Ulldecona (Silvestri, 1923); Alicante: Sierra de Aitana (Jiménez-Valverde et al., 2015). Balearic Islands: Spain: Illes Balears: Ibiza (without further locality) (Müller et al., 2007); Illes Balears: Cabrera: Cabrera Gran, zona Monument als Francesos (Vadell, 2010).
New records. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Castellón: Benicasim, Desierto de las Palmas, 40°04’17’’N 0°01’01’’E, forest of Pinus halepensis, 19/II/2017, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero, D. Osca leg. (n = 1); Girona: Lloret de Mar: Ermita de Santa Cristina, 41°41’21”N 2°48’54”E, mixed forest of Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex, 21/IX/2017 (n = 3) and 19/XII/2017 (n = 1), P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg.; Girona: Aprox. 2 Km N Blanes, 41°42’08”N 2°47’14”E, forest of Pinus pinea with Quercus suber, 15/IX/2017, E. Recuero, M. García París leg. (n = 10); Girona: Blanes: Castell de Sant Joan, 41°40’43”N 2°47’59”E, forest of Pinus halepensis with Quercus ilex, 4/III/2018, E. Recuero, P. Rodríguez-Flores leg (n = 3).
Comments. Given the habitats occupied by the species and its wide but disjunct distribution, additional populations are likely to be found in more places.
Family Polyxenidae Lucas, 1840
Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Figs. 1H, 2)
Scolopendra lagura Linnaeus, 1758: 637.
Iulus lagurus (Linnaeus): De Geer, 1778: 572.
Iulus penicillatus De Geer, 1778: 572.
Pollyxenus [sic] lagurus (Linnaeus): Latreille, 1804: 81.
Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus): Latzel, 1884: 74.
Polyxenus germanicus Verhoeff, 1941: 263.
General distribution. Polyxenus lagurus shows the largest distribution range among Polyxenida species, being reported across the Western Palaearctic, from the British Islands in the west to the Caucasus in the east, and Scandinavia in the north and North Africa in the south (Brolemann, 1930; Condè, 1961; Kime & Enghoff, 2011; Short et al., 2020), with presence also in Israel (Condè & Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1970, but see Short, 2020). It has been recorded from the Azores Archipelago (Brolemann, 1896; Condè, 1961), where it was probably introduced by human activity, as also seems to be the case in North America, where it is widely distributed (Condè, 1996; Hoffman, 1999) and in Australia (Short & Vahtera, 2017).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and/or Canary Islands.
Published data. Iberian Peninsula. Portugal: Porto: Porto (Machado, 1946); Portugal: Porto: Recarei (Machado, 1946); Braga: Joane (Machado, 1946); Braga: Mata da Albergaria (Parque Nacional da Peneda-Geres) (Cardoso et al., 2008); Spain: Guipúzcoa: “Mte. Alzo bei Tolosa” (likely Monte Ollagón, between Tolosa and Altzo) (Attems, 1952); Girona: without locality data (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1976); Barcelona: Parc Natural de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l’Obac (Miquel et al., 2000); Asturias: Mieres: Área recreativa de El Cantu, (Torralba Burrial & Outomuro, 2007); Granada: Sierra Nevada, pico Veleta (Schubart, 1959; Gilgado et al., 2015); Granada: Sierra Nevada, Pradollano (Schubart, 1959); Granada: SierraNevada, Loma de Monachil (Schubart, 1959). Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Mallorca: Llucmajor, Cabo Blanco (Enghoff & Vicente, 2000); Illes Balears: Ibiza: La Joya (Sammler et al., 2006); Illes Balears: Ibiza: Club Cala Llenya (Sammler et al., 2006).
New records. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Madrid: El Pardo, 40°28’55”N 3°44’45”W, forest of Quercus ilex, 13/II/2013 (n = 3) and 24/IV/2013 (n = 1), E. Recuero leg.; Madrid: Horcajo de la Sierra, 41°03’44”N 3°35’18”W, 11/IV/2018, E. K. López-Estrada, M. García-París leg. (n = 3); Pontevedra: Catoira, 42°40’09’’N 8°42’58’’W, in leaf litter sample, 8/I/2017, R. González leg. (n = 2); Alicante: Denia: La Xara, 38°49’20’’N 0°03’51’’E, in soil sample, Mediterranean scrub on limestone karst, 18/II/2017, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 1); Girona: Lloret de Mar: Playa de Santa Cristina, 41°41’21”N 2°48’54”E, in leaf litter samples from mixed forest of Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex, 20/X/2017, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 3); Cáceres: Aprox. 2.5 Km SE Torres de Santa María, 39°14’32”N 6°05’13”W, in forest fragment of Quercus ilex, 24/II/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 7); Álava: Laguardia, 42°32’25”N 2°33’59”W, open scrubland among cultivated fields, 5/XII/2018, E. K. López-Estrada, M. García-París leg. (n = 2); Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Menorca: Aprox. 3 Km S Fornells, 40°01’38’’N 4°06’53’’E, open forest of Pinus halepensis, 3/IV/2017, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero, M. García-París, P. Mas leg. (n = 1); Illes Balears: Mallorca: Cala Murta, 39°57’02.0’’N 3°12’02.1’’E, under rocks in forest of Pinus halepensis on limestone karst, 1/IV/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero, M. García-París, P. Mas leg. (n = 1).
Comments. Kime & Enghoff (2011) provide 8 records in the Iberian Peninsula and two in the Balearic Islands; for some of them we could not find precise localities, but they are indicative of the presence of the species in the Pyreenees and the Ebro Valley. This species is not reported from the Canary Islands. The species is reported for the first time from the island of Menorca and from central Iberia, where it is probably widespread. The taxonomic identity of Iberian and Balearic population needs additional study. Preliminary data suggest that they could represent a species morphologically close but different to P. lagurus (Short et al., 2020). However, pending further molecular studies, we prefer to stick with the traditional use of the name P. lagurus for these populations.
Polyxenus fasciculatus Say, 1821 (Figs 1G, 3)
Polyxenus fasciculatus Say, 1821: 108.
General distribution. Widely distributed in central and southeastern United States, with presence in several Atlantic islands: Bermuda, Madeira, and the Canary Islands (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996; Hoffman, 1999).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Canary Islands. Spain: Las Palmas: Gran Canaria: W of Artenara, 1200 m (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Gran Canaria: Cruz de Tejeda, 1500 m (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Gran Canaria: Vega de Acusa (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Gran Canaria: Valle de Agaete (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Montaña de la Hoya (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Los Carboneros (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Vueltas Taganana (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Agua Garcia et Las Mercedes (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Sieste Cañadas (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Gomera: Barranco de Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: El Hierro: Montaña de las Cuevas(Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: El Hierro: El Fayal, c. 4 km SSW Mirador de Jinama (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
New records. Canary Islands. Spain: Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Mirador del Torreón, aprox. 1 km NW El Tanque, 28°21’42”N 16°47’30”W, in a grove of Eucalyptus and scrub of Erica, 11/I/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 4); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Tacoronte: Agua García, 28°27’23”N 16°24’06”W, in an old plantation of Pinus radiata with Erica scrub, 14/I/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 1).
Comments. The species has been suggested as probably introduced in the Canary Islands (Arndt et al., 2008), but there are no studies on the dispersion routes for the species.
Polyxenus oromii Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996 (Fig. 3)
Polyxenus oromii Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996: 116.
General distribution. An endemic species known only from the Canary Islands (La Palma, Tenerife and Fuerteventura) (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Canary Islands. Spain: Santa Cruz: La Palma: Teneguia (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Punta del Teno (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Fuerteventura: Puerto Lajas (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
Comments. The species has been found only in littoral rocky habitats (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
Polyxenus sp. (Fig. 2)
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Mallorca: Randa, route menant au monastère de N. S. de Cura (Condè, 1954a).
Comment. This record corresponds to a female with antennal characters as in P. lapidicola Silvestri, 1903 and trichomes as in P. lagurus (Condè, 1954a). This morphologically peculiar specimen could be indicative of the presence of further species of the genus Polyxenus in the Balearic Islands.
Macroxenus enghoffi Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996 (Fig. 3)
Macroxenus enghoffi Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996: 117.
General distribution. Known with certainty only from a few localities in the eastern Canary Islands, it could also be present in Cape Verde (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Canary Islands. Spain: Las Palmas: Fuerteventura: Cumbre Jandia (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Fuerteventura: Betancuria (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 2009); Las Palmas: Montaña Clara (Macías et al., 2003).
Comments. One immature specimen from Santo Antão Island, Cape Verde, was identified as affinis to this species, but it could represent an additional species (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996).
Macroxenus rubromarginatus (Lucas, 1846) (Fig. 2)
Polyxenus rubromarginatus Lucas, 1846: 283.
Macroxenus rubromarginatus (Lucas): Brolemann, 1917: 114.
General distribution. Very few records exist for this species, sparsely distributed in Algeria, Morocco, Malta, and southern Portugal (Lucas, 1846; Brolemann, 1917; Condè, 1954c; Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 2009).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Iberian Peninsula. Portugal: Faro: Albufeira: Praia de Lourenço (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 2009).
Comments. The distribution pattern could suggest a still largely unknown real distribution of this species or, alternatively, events of long-distance, perhaps anthropogenic, dispersal.
Family Lophoproctidae Silvestri, 1897
Lophoproctinus inferus (Silvestri, 1903) (Fig. 4)
Lophoproctus inferus Silvestri, 1903: 5.
Lophoproctinus inferus (Silvestri): Silvestri, 1948: 217.
Lophoproctinus inferus maurus Marquet & Condè, 1950: 124.
General distribution. Originally described from Portici, in the Gulf of Naples (Italy) (Silvestri, 1903), it has also been recorded from southern Corsica (France) and Mallorca (Spain) (Condè, 1953, 1954a). A second subspecies, L. inferus maurus was described from Algeria and is also recorded from Tunisia, Morocco and the Canary Islands (Spain) (Marquet & Condè, 1950; Condè, 1954c; Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996; Kime & Enghoff, 2011).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Mallorca: Son Servera, km 11.1 of the road to Capdepera (Condè, 1954a); Illes Balears: Mallorca: Between Son Servera and Porto Cristo (Condè, 1954a); Illes Balears: Mallorca: Porto-Cristo, road to Cueva del Drach (Condè, 1954a); Illes Balears: Mallorca: Porto Colom (Condè, 1954a). Canary Islands. Spain: Las Palmas: Fuerteventura: Jandia: Barranco del Ciervo, Morro de Cavedero N of Morro Jable (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Las Palmas: Gran Canaria: Roque Bentayga, SW slope (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: Tenerife: Barranco de Las Cuevas, Teno Alto (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996); Santa Cruz: El Hierro: El Justo Cave (Kime & Enghoff, 2011).
Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann, 1910) (Figs 1A-B, 3)
Polyxenus lucidus var. jeanneli Brolemann, 1910: 341.
Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann): Condè, 1953: 34.
Lophoproctus litoralis Verhoeff, 1952: 148.
General distribution. Described from a cave in southeastern France (Brolemann, 1910), L. jeanneli has also been recorded from scattered points in the Iberian Peninsula, the Mediterranean islands of Mallorca, Corsica, Capri and Malta, and from Lebanon (revised in Short, 2015b). The record from Israel by Condè & Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin (1970) likely corresponds to L. israelensis Short, 2020 (Short, 2020).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Barcelona: Parc Municipal de Barcelone (with no further detail) (Condè, 1954a); Jaén: Villacarrillo: Cueva de la Morciguilla (Golovatch & Mauriès, 2013). Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Mallorca: Esporlas (Condè, 1954a).
New records. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Girona: Lloret de Mar: Ermita de Santa Cristina, 41°41’21”N 2°48’54”E, mixed forest of Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex, 20/IX/2017 (n = 4), 20/X/2017 (n = 3), 19/XII/2017 (n = 10) and 05/V/2018 (n = 3), P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg.; Girona: Blanes, 41°40’27”N 2°45’44”E, in meadow surrounded by cultivated fields, 14/XI/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 3); Barcelona: Fogás de Monclús: La Costa de Montseny, 41°45’00”N 2°24’55”E, in oak forest, 18/I/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 1); Barcelona: Barcelona: Parque de la Ciudadela, 41°23’13”N 2°11’13”E, in garden with abundant leaf litter, 15/IX/2018, E. Recuero leg. (n = 2); Barcelona: Sant Celoni: Boscos del Montnegre, 41°41’09”N 2°32’11”E, in Quercus suber forest, 16/II/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 7); Madrid: Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 40°26’29”N 3°41’24”W, in small garden with Quercux ilex, 11/XII/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 5).
Comments. The distribution of this species in the Iberian Peninsula is highly disjunct, with presence in three geographically distant and ecologically diverse regions. This could be due to a lack of sampling in the intervening areas, long-distance dispersal or range fragmentation of a formerly wider distribution range.
Lophoproctus lucidus (Chalande, 1888) (Figs 1C-D, 4)
Pollyxenus lucidus Chalande, 1888: 99.
Lophoproctus lucidus (Chalande): Silvestri, 1894: 196.
General distribution. Lophoproctus lucidus was described from the Pyrénées-Orientales Department in southern France (Chalande, 1888), and has been recorded from several localities in southeastern France, as well as from isolated points in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia (revised in Short, 2015b). It is reported here for the first time from the Iberian Peninsula and the Canary Islands.
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and/or Canary Islands
New records. Iberian Peninsula. Spain: Girona: Blanes: Cala de Sant Francesc, 41°40’42 “N 2°48’04”E, in pine-oak forest with Pinus halepensis, Quercus suber and Q. ilex, 9/XII/2017 (n = 2), 10/III/2018 (n = 4), 3/VII/2018 (n = 5), P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg.; Girona: Blanes, Ermita de Santa Barbara, 41°40’58”N 2°48’01”E, in dense forest of Quercus suber and Pinus halepensis, 8/XI/2017, P. Rodríguez-Flores leg. (n = 2); Girona: La Creueta, 41°57’54”N 2°51’.9”E, in forest of Pinus pinaster, 17/II/2018, E. Recuero leg. (n = 6); Cuenca: Saelices, 39°54’05”N 2°47’46”W, in forest of Quercus ilex, 9/XII/2012, E. Recuero, M. García leg. (n = 5); Cuenca: Puerto de Cabrejas, 40°04’19”N 2°18’39”W, in forest of Pinus nigra, 9/XII/2012, E. Recuero, M. García leg. (n = 1); Cuenca: Cuenca, 40°05’06”N 2°08’25”W, in forest of Pinus nigra, 3/VI/2018, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 2); Cuenca: Villamayor de Santiago, 39°42’30”N 2°53’53”W, 3/III/2021, N. Cardo leg. (n = 2); Albacete: 2 Km SW Munera, 39°00’33”N 2°30’59”W, 22/X/2017, A. Sánchez, R. González, K. López, M. García leg. (n = 3); Valencia: ElRebollar, 39°28’03”N 1°01’05”W, 728 m, in forest of Pinus halepensis, 21/II/2021, P. Rodríguez-Flores, E. Recuero leg. (n = 1); Canary Islands. Spain: Santa Cruz: El Hierro: Villa de Valverde, 27°48’04”N 17°54’55”W, under plank pieces in Euphorbia scrub, 14/I/2018, P. Rodríguez, E. Recuero leg. (n = 5).
Comments. The wide, disjunct distribution of the species in Europe, North Africa and particularly the Canary Islands could be indicative of long-distance dispersals probably associated to human activity.
Lophoproctus pagesi Condè, 1981 (Fig. 3)
Lophoproctus pagesi Condè, 1981: 314.
Lophoproctus cf. pagesi Condè: Cardoso et al., 2008: 360.
General distribution. The species is only known with certainty from a few caves in Mallorca (Vadell et al., 2007). The identity of the population found in Portugal still needs to be studied in more detail (Cardoso et al., 2008).
Records from the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and/or Canary Islands
Published data. Balearic Islands. Spain: Illes Balears: Mallorca: Cueva de Genova, near Palma (Condè, 1981); Illes Balears: Mallorca: Cova des Pas de Vallgornera (Sala de les Arrels) (Vadell et al., 2007). Iberian Peninsula. Portugal: Setubal: Gruta do Fumo (Parque Natural da Arrabida) (Cardoso et al., 2008).
Discussion[Up]
With about 150 species present in all continents but Antarctica, Polyxenida is one of the smallest orders among Diplopoda (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin & Geoffroy, 2003; Short, 2015a). Its diversity in the European Mediterranean and Macaronesian regions is moderate, as only 19 species have been recorded (Kime & Enghoff, 2011). The diversity of the Iberian Peninsula, the Balearic Islands, and the Canary Islands is characterized by the presence of a few relatively widespread species and only three to four endemic taxa, two in the Canary Islands (Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, 1996) and one from the Balearic Islands and the Iberian Peninsula (Cardoso et al., 2008), which probably correspond to two different cryptic species.
The number of published records of Polyxenida from the geographical regions considered in this study is very low. This could reflect the rarity of these species, but is most likely the result of a general lack of studies of the group. Increased efforts in sampling and identification of these tiny millipedes will certainly increase the known distribution of the species and perhaps also increase the known diversity with new records and new taxa.
In this sense, Citizen science projects such as iNaturalist could be useful to get a more or less accurate idea of the distribution, phenology, and abundance of such poorly known invertebrate species (e.g., Mesaglio et al., 2021; Rosa et al., 2022), and they are increasingly being used for research projects in disciplines as ecology, taxonomy, biogeography, conservation, etc. (e.g., Poisson et al., 2020; Krueger et al., 2023; Whittaker et al., 2023). However, the data gathered through such initiatives have some limitations, especially for taxonomically challenging groups such as millipedes. For instance, with the available information, it is impossible to identify most Polyxenida species without a proper examination of microscopic characters that are not visible when using standard macrophotography, as the number and disposition of basiconic sensillae of the 6th antenomere (e.g., Short, 2015b, 2020). In the case of the faunas studied here, identification based on the available pictures is only possible with certainty to Family level. For instance, among the Lophoproctidae recorded in iNaturalist for the Iberian Peninsula,two of them were tentatively assigned to L. coecus, but apparently without close examination of the specimens. This species has been found in Italy and adjacent south-eastern France, Crimea, the Caucasus and isolated records from Iran and Kyrgyzstan (Short, 2015b), and its presence in Granada province would be surprising, and for now these identifications should be regarded as invalid. The identification of these samples, as well as others proposed in iNaturalist (Lophoproctus, Polyxenus lagurus, P. fasciculatus) should be confirmed by examining specimens under a microscope. Nevertheless, the information obtained from citizen science projects can be useful to increase our knowledge on groups as Polyxenida. For instance, some general patterns can be seen, such as a predominant distribution of Lophoproctidae across eastern and southern areas of the Iberian Peninsula mostly characterized by limestone substrates and Mediterranean climate, whereas Polyxenidae seems more generalistic and present in different soil types and climate conditions, although with a higher number of observations in areas with Atlantic influence. Large interior areas in the Iberian Peninsula have no records, but it is hard to know if this reflect a real trend for the group or if observations are geographically biased. From our own data we know that both Polyxenus and Lophoproctus havepopulations in many interior provinces in Spain, but we still do not know how fragmented their distributions are.
Many of the species present in the studied regions present a wide distribution range, but most of them are known only from a few scattered localities (Kime & Enghoff, 2011). This is the case with Phryssonotus platycephalus, Lophoproctinus inferus, Lophoproctus lucidus, Lophoproctus jeanneli and Macroxenus rubrimarginatus, which have been found in different areas of the Western Mediterranean and the Canary Islands. There are different possible explanations for this pattern of geographic distribution. First, it is likely that our current knowledge on the actual distribution of these species is far from complete and that they have not been found yet in large areas between known localities. For instance, in the case of Lophoproctus jeanneli and L. lucidus, records from southern France, where Polyxenida fauna has been thoroughly studied, are abundant, while their records from other, not so well studied areas, are scarce and often isolated. It is possible that, as is the case for other taxa, increasing research efforts in these regions will increase the number of records and will show a more continuous distribution (e.g., Recuero & Rodríguez-Flores 2019). However, the disjunct distribution pattern observed in these species could be real. In this case, it could be that the current distribution is the result of thefragmentation of a much larger and continuous ancestral distribution. Recurrent range fragmentations in the Palaearctic have been frequent and triggered by climatic changes associated to glacial cycles during the Pleistocene (Schmitt, 2007). If this was the case, it is logical to assume that the optimal climatic conditions for these species occurred during glacial maxima and that they are currently restricted to interglacial refugia. However, considering that most records are found in warm Mediterranean areas it is unlikely that this is the case, as these localities are very different to the usually recognized interglacial refugia areas (Teixeira et al., 2018; Sánchez-Montes et al., 2019; Rodríguez-Flores et al., 2020).
As an alternative to the fragmentation of former continuous distribution ranges, it is possible that these species can complete long-distance dispersal processes, colonizing new geographical areas even across the sea. Even if their dispersal abilities seem quite limited, it has been postulated that at least some Polyxenida species may be able to perform aerial dispersal, by being blown in the wind, or by phoresy as they could get accidentally attached to bird feathers (Short et al., 2020). This could explain the frequently observed disjunct distribution patterns, as new populations could colonize distant regions by air, while expansion in newly colonized areas would be slow due to limited terrestrial dispersal abilities. However, there is no data on how common or how far can aerial dispersal occur, if it is possible at all, and which species are able to disperse that way.
Another way for long-distance dispersal is associated with human activities. There are known cases where Polyxenida species have colonized new biogeographical regions accidentally dispersed by humans. Polyxenus lagurus, a species native to Europe, can now be found in large areas of North America and even in Australia (Short & Vahtera, 2017). Likewise, the presence of Polyxenus fasciculatus in the Canary Islands is thought to be caused by an involuntary introduction (Arndt et al., 2008). The population of Lophoproctus jeanneli found in urban areas in Barcelona and Madrid could have originated from individuals traveling in plant pots used to revegetate those gardens. The population of Lophoproctus lucidus found in El Hierro Island, found over 1000 Km from the nearest known localities, could also have originated from an accidental introduction, as has also been hypothesized for the populations of L. lucidus found in Morocco (Short, 2015b).
However, much more data is necessary to discern among these possible explanations, including collecting more data on the distribution of the species and using molecular data to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the species and identify dispersal processes and routes among populations.
Acknowledgments[Up]
We thank M. García París, P. Mas Peinado, R. González Minguens, K. López Estrada, D. Osca, A. Sánchez Vialas, and N. Cardo Maeso for their help in the field and/or for providing samples. PCR-F is supported by a Biodiversity postdoctoral fellowship from the MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology) at Harvard University.
References[Up]
|
Alexander, K. N., 2006. The habitat preferences of Polyxenus lagurus (Linné). Bulletin of the British Myriapod and Isopod Group, 21: 12–13. |
|
|
Arndt, E., Enghoff, H. & Spelda, J., 2008. Millipedes (Diplopoda) of the Canarian Islands: Checklist and key. Vieraea, 36: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.31939/vieraea.2008. 36.01 |
|
|
Attems, C., 1928. The Myriopoda of South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 26: 1–431. |
|
|
Attems, C., 1952. Myriopoden der Forschungsreise Dr. H. Franz in Spanien 1951 nebst Übersicht über die gesamte iberische Myriopodenfauna. Eos, 28: 323–366 |
|
|
Benavides, L. R., Edgecombe, G.D. & Giribet, G., 2023. Re-evaluating and dating myriapod diversification with phylotranscriptomics under a regime of dense taxon sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 178: 107621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107621 |
|
|
Brolemann, H.W., 1896. Myriapodes provenant des campagnes scientifiques de l’Hirondelle et de la Princesse Alice. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 21: 198-204. |
|
|
Brolemann, H.W., 1910. Biospeologica. XVII. Symphyles, Pselaphognathes, Polydesmoides et Lysiopetaloides (Myriapodes) (première série). Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale, 5esérie, 5: 339–378. |
|
|
Brolemann, H.W., 1917. Macroxenus, nouveau genre de Myriapodes Psélaphognathes. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire naturelle de l’Afrique du Nord, 8: 114–118. |
|
|
Brolemann, H.W., 1930. Myriapodes du Sahara central recueillis par L. G. Seurat au cours de la mission du Hoggar (février-avril 1928). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire naturelle de l’Afrique du Nord, 21: 6–8. |
|
|
Cardoso, P., Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M. & Rasteiro, F., 2008. New and first records of Polyxenida (Diplopoda: Penicillata) from Portugal. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 42: 360. |
|
|
Chalande, J., 1888. Les Pollyxenidae de France; révision du genre Pollyxenus. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 22: 86–90. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1953. Diplopodes Pénicillates de Corse. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 78: 33-35. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1954a. Sur la faune endogée de Majorque (Penicillates, Protures, Diploures Campodéidés, Palpigrades). Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 2e série, 26: 674–677. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1954b. Les Diplopodes Pénicillates de l’ambre et la faune actuelle. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 79: 74–78. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1954c. Diplopodes Pénicillates d’Afrique septentrionale. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 2e série, 26: 496–500. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1961. Diplopodes Pénicillates des Acores et de Madère. Boletim do Museu municipal do Funchal, 14: 7–10. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1968. Le statut de Lophoproctus litoralis Verhoeff (Diplopode Penicillate). Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 2e série, 40: 497–499. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1981. Un Pénicillate cavernicole de Majorque (Diplopoda, Penicillata). Archives des Sciences et compte rendu des Séances de la Société, 34: 313–318. |
|
|
Condè, B., 1989. Découverte, dans une seconde grotte, du Diplopode Pénicillate Lophoproctus jeanneli (Brolemann). Revue suisse de Zoologie, 96: 91–97. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.117759 |
|
|
Condè, B., 1996. Une approche des Diplopoda Penicillata de l’Amerique du Nord. In: J.-J. Geoffroy, J.-P. Mauriès & M. Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin (eds.). Acta Myriapodologica. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 169. Paris: 127–135. |
|
|
Condè, B. & Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., 1970. Pénicillates d’Israël rassemblés par G. Levy. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 2esérie, 42: 1251–1258. |
|
|
De Geer, C., 1778. Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire des insectes, tome septième. Hesselberg. Stockholm. 950 pp. |
|
|
Donisthorpe, H., 1927. The Guests of British Ants: Their Habits and Life-histories. George Routledge and Sons. London. 244 pp. |
|
|
Edgecombe, G.D., 2015. Diplopoda – Fossils. In: A. Minelli (ed.). Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda, volume 2. Brill. Leiden: 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004188273_015 |
|
|
Enghoff, H. & Vicente, M.C., 2000. Millipedes of the Balearic Islands, and the identity of the species described by L. Koch in 1881 (Diplopoda). Steenstrupia, 25: 195–200. |
|
|
Gilgado, J.D., Enghoff, H., Tinaut, A., Mauries, J.-P. & Ortuño, V.M., 2015. Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain): a high-altitude biogeographical crossroads for millipedes (Diplopoda), with first data on its MSS fauna and description of a new species of the genus Ceratosphys Ribaut, 1920 (Chordeumatida: Opisthocheiridae). Zootaxa, 4044: 391–410. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4044.3.4 |
|
|
Golovatch, S.I. & Mauriès, J.-P., 2013. Los diplópodos (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) subterráneos de Jaén. In: T. Pérez Fernández & A. Pérez Ruiz (coord.). Los invertebrados de hábitats subterráneos de Jaén. Grupo de Espeleología de Villacarrillo. Jaén: 88–93. |
|
|
Hoffman, R.L., 1999. Checklist of the millipedes of North and Middle America. Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication, 8: 1–584. |
|
|
Hopkin, S.P. & Read, H.J., 1992. The biology of millipedes. Oxford Univerity Press. Oxford. 233 pp. |
|
|
Ishii, K. & Yamaoka, H., 1982. The species and number of symbiotic penicillate millipeds in arboreal ant nests. The Canadian Entomologist, 114: 767–768. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent114767-8 |
|
|
Jiménez-Valverde, A., Gilgado, J.D., Sendra, A., Pérez-Suárez, G., Herrero-Borgoñón, J. J. & Ortuño, V.M., 2015. Exceptional invertebrate diversity in a scree slope in Eastern Spain. Journal of insect conservation, 19: 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9794-1 |
|
|
Kahle, D.J. & Wickham, H., 2013. ggmap: spatial visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal, 5: 144. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2013-014 |
|
|
Kime, R. D. & Enghoff. H., 2011. Atlas of European Millipedes (Class Diplopoda). Volume 1. Orders Polyxenida, Glomerida, Platydesmida, Siphonocryptida, Polyzoniida, Callipodida, Polydesmida. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow & European Invertebrate Survey. Leiden. 282 pp. |
|
|
Krueger, T., Robinson, A., Bourke, G. & Fleischmann, A., 2023. Small leaves, big diversity: Citizen science and taxonomic revision triples species number in the carnivorous Drosera microphylla complex (D. section Ergaleium, Droseraceae). Biology, 12: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010141 |
|
|
Latreille, P.A., 1804. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes, Volume 7. F. Dufart. Paris. 413 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15764 |
|
|
Latzel, R., 1884. Die Myriopoden der Österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie. Zweite Hälfte. Die Symphylen, Pauropoden und Diplopoden. Alfred Hölder. Wien. 414 pp. |
|
|
Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema naturae, per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius. Holmiae. 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 |
|
|
Lucas, H., 1846. Note sur quelques nouvelles espèces d’insectes qui habitent les possessions françaises du Nord de l’Afrique. Revue Zoologique, 9: 283–289. |
|
|
Machado, A., 1946. Contribuição para o conhecimento dos miriápodes de Portugal. Broteria, 15: 5–37. |
|
|
Macías, N., Pérez, A.J., López, H. & Oromí, P. 2003. Fauna de artrópodos de Montaña Clara (Islas Canarias) III: arácnidos, miriápodos y crustáceos terrestres. Revista de la Academia Canaria de Ciencias, 15: 53–68. |
|
|
Marquet, M.L. & Condè, B., 1950. Contribution à la connaissance des Diplopodes Pénicillates d’Afrique et de la région madécasse. Mémoires de l’Institut scientifique de Madagascar, série A, 4: 113–134 |
|
|
Melic, A., 2015. Introducción a la Clase Diplopoda. Órdenes Polyxenida, Polyzoniida, Platydesmida y Siphonocryptida. Revista IDE@-SEA, 23: 1–18. |
|
|
Mesaglio, T., Soh, A., Kurniawidjaja, S. & Sexton, C., 2021. ‘First Known Photographs of Living Specimens’: the power of iNaturalist for recording rare tropical butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation, 25: 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-021-00350-7 |
|
|
Miquel, C., Serra, A. & Mateos, E., 2000. A soil population of Polyxenus lagurus in a Mediterranean forest (Diplopoda, Penicillata: Polyxenida). In: J. Wytwer & S.I. Golovatch (eds.). Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Fragmenta faunistica, 43 (Supplement). Warsaw: 371–382. |
|
|
Müller, C.H., Sombke, A. & Rosenberg, J., 2007. The fine structure of the eyes of some bristly millipedes (Penicillata, Diplopoda): additional support for the homology of mandibulate ommatidia. Arthropod Structure & Development, 36: 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2007.09.002 |
|
|
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., 1976. Etude de la variabilité des charactères de deux espèces du genre Polyxenus, P. lagurus (L.) et P. fasciculatus Say (Diplopode, Pénicillate). Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 3esérie, Zoologie, 249: 105–118. |
|
|
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., 1993. Convergences évolutives entre Diplopodes Pénicillates vivant dans des grottes. Mémoires de Biospéologie, 20: 147–155. |
|
|
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., 1996. Systématique et biogéographie des diplopodes pénicillates des îles Canaries et du Cap Vert. In: J.-J. Geoffroy, J.-P. Mauriès & M. Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin (eds.). Acta Myriapodologica. Mémoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 169. Paris: 113–126. |
|
|
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M., 2009. Revision of the genera of Polyxenidae bearing pseudoarticulated gnathochilarial sensilla (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Polyxenidae), with the description of two new species. Zoosystema, 31: 829–848. https://doi.org/10.5252/z2009n4a5 |
|
|
Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin, M. & Geoffroy, J.-J., 2003. A revised comprehensive checklist, relational database, and taxonomic system of reference for the bristly millipedes of the World (Diplopoda, Polyxenida). African Invertebrates, 44: 89–101. |
|
|
Poisson, A.C., McCullough, I.M., Cheruvelil, K.S., Elliott, K.C., Latimore, J.A. & Soranno, P. A. 2020. Quantifying the contribution of citizen science to broad-scale ecological databases. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2128 |
|
|
Recuero, E. & Rodríguez Flores, P.C. 2019. On the geographic distribution of the uncommon Iberian endemic Armadillidium mateui Vandel, 1953 (Crustacea, Isopoda, Armadillidiidae). Graellsia, 75: e096. https://doi.org/10.3989/graellsia.2019.v75.239 |
|
|
Rodríguez-Flores, P.C., Recuero, E., Jiménez-Ruiz, Y. & García-París, M., 2020. Limited long-distance dispersal success in a Western European fairy shrimp evidenced by nuclear and mitochondrial lineage structuring. Current Zoology, 66: 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz054 |
|
|
Rosa, R.M., Cavallari, D.C. & Salvador, R.B., 2022. iNaturalist as a tool in the study of tropical molluscs. PlOS One, 17: e0268048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268048 |
|
|
Sammler, S., Voigtländer, K., Stoev, P., Enghoff, H. & Müller, C.H.G., 2006. New studies on myriapods (Chilopoda, Diplopoda) from Ibiza with a checklist for the Balearic Islands. Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 53: 299–309. |
|
|
Sánchez-Montes, G., Recuero, E., Barbosa, A.M. & Martínez-Solano, Í., 2019. Complementing the Pleistocene biogeography of European amphibians: Testimony from a southern Atlantic species. Journal of Biogeography, 46: 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13515 |
|
|
Say, T., 1821. Description of the Myriapoda of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2(1): 102–114. |
|
|
Schmitt, T., 2007. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Frontiers in Zoology, 4: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-4-11 |
|
|
Schubart, O., 1959. Zoologisch-systematische Ergebnisse der Studienreise von H. Janetschek und W. Steiner in die spanische Sierra Nevada 1954. XII. Diplopoda. Sitzungsberichte, Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung I, 168: 479–495. |
|
|
Short, M., 2015a. Subclass Penicillata Latreille, 1831. In: A. Minelli (ed.). Treatise on zoology – anatomy, taxonomy, biology. The Myriapoda, volume 2. Brill. Leiden: 364–369. |
|
|
Short, M., 2015b. New records of Lophoproctus coecus Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda, Polyxenida, Lophoproctidae) extend the range of the genus Lophoproctus. ZooKeys, 510: 209–222. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8668 |
|
|
Short, M., 2020. New species of Polyxenida in Israel (Diplopoda, Penicillata). Opuscula Zoológica, 51 (Supplement 2): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.18348/opzool.2020.S2.35 |
|
|
Short, M. & Vahtera, V., 2017. Phylogenetic relationships of millipedes in the subclass Penicillata (Diplopoda) with a key to the genera. Journal of Natural History, 51: 2443–2461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1380241 |
|
|
Short, M., Vahtera, V., Wesener, T. & Golovatch, S.I., 2020. The millipede family Polyxenidae (Diplopoda, Polyxenida) in the faunas of the Crimean Peninsula and Caucasus, with notes on other European Polyxenidae. Zootaxa, 4772: 306–332. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4772.2.4 |
|
|
Silvestri, F., 1894. Contribuzione alla conoscenza dei Chilopodi, Symphili, Pauropodi e Diplopodi dell’Umbria e del Lazio. Bollettino della Società Romana per gli Studi Zoologici, 3: 191–201. |
|
|
Silvestri, F., 1903. Classis Diplopoda. In: A. Berlese (ed.). Acari, Myriapoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Anatome, vol. 1. Premiato stab. tip. Vesuviano. Portici. 272 pp. |
|
|
Silvestri, F., 1923. Notizia della presenza del genere Synxenus (Myriapoda Diplopoda) in Catalogna e descrizione di quattro specie. Treballs del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, 4: 5–15. |
|
|
Silvestri, F., 1948. Tavola sinottica dei generi dei Diplopoda Penicillata. Bollettino del Laboratorio di entomologia agraria “Filippo Silvestri”, 8: 214–-220. |
|
|
South, A. & South, M.A., 2016. Package ‘rworldmap’. Mapping global data. The R Journal, 3: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2011-006 |
|
|
Stoev, P. & Lapeva-Gjonova, A., 2005. Myriapods from ant nests in Bulgaria (Chilopoda, Diplopoda). Peckiana, 4: 131–142. |
|
|
Tajovský, K., Mock, A. & Krumpál, M., 2001. Millipedes (Diplopoda) in birds’ nests. European Journal of Soil Biology, 37: 321–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01108-6 |
|
|
Teixeira, J., Gonçalves, H., Ferrand, N., García-París, M. & Recuero, E., 2018. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the Iberian endemic frog Rana iberica, with implications for its conservation. Current Zoology, 64: 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy010 |
|
|
Torralba Burrial, A. & Outomuro, D., 2007. Primera cita de Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diplopoda: Polyxenida) en Asturias (norte de Spain). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 40: 384. |
|
|
Vadell, M., 2010. Sobre la presencia de Phryssonotus platycephalus (Lucas, 1846) en el Archipiélago de Cabrera (Diplopoda: Polyxenida: Synxenidae). Bolletí de la Societat d’Història Natural de les Balears, 53: 85–90. |
|
|
Vadell, M., Jordana, R., Sendra, A. & Moraza, M.L., 2007. Primeros datos sobre la fauna cavernicola terrestre de la cova des pas de Vallgornera (Llucmajor, Mallorca, Baleares). Endins, 31: 117–124. |
|
|
Verhoeff, K.W., 1941. Zur Kenntnis der Polyxenus-Arten. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 133: 259–264. |
|
|
Verhoeff, K.W., 1952. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Isopoden- und Diplopodenfauna von Ischia und Capri. Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 3: 125–150. |
|
|
Whitaker, J.O. Jr. & Ruckdeschel, C., 2010. Spanish moss, the unfinished chigger story. Southeastern Naturalist, 9: 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.009.0107 |
|
|
Whittaker, R.J., Franklin, J., Ladle, R.J., La Sorte, F.A. & Schiebelhut, L.M., 2023. Community Science Biogeography. Frontiers of Biogeography, 15: e60136. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG60136 |