Abstract

The hoverfly Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000 (Syrphidae: Eristalinae) was recorded from France and Portugal. In this work, it is reported from Spain for the first time. In Murcia province, the species was caught at the hydro dam “Presa de la Risca”. The habitat consisted of newly flooded forested meadows with decaying shrubs and dead trees, where the aquatic larvae of Parhelophilus live. This habitat has most likely been lost by now, as most of the area has been flooded, and the current presence of P. crococoronatus needs to be confirmed. In Granada province, P. crococoronatus was collected in a Phragmites-rich natural wetland, while in Huelva it was collected in a marshland with trees and low vegetation. The findings show that, even if the habitat of P. crococoronatus in Murcia has disappeared, the species is more widespread and has viable populations in Spain. Additional records of Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794) and Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775) are provided.

Keywords: Parhelophilus crococoronatus; Spain; hydro dam; wetlands.

Resumen

Nuevos datos del género Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 de España, incluidos los primeros registros de P. crococoronatus Reemer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae)

El sírfido Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000 (Syrphidae: Eristalinae) estaba registrado de Francia y Portugal. En este trabajo, se documenta, por primera vez, de España. En la provincia de Murcia, el hábitat donde esta especie se ha capturado es el Embalse de la Risca, constituido por valles forestales arbolados recientemente inundados, con matorrales en descomposición y árboles muertos, donde viven las larvas acuáticas de Parhelophilus. Este hábitat ha desaparecido por inundación, por lo que la presencia actual en esta ubicación de P. crococoronatus requiere de confirmación. En la provincia de Granada, P. crococoronatus se recolectó en un humedal natural dominado por Phragmites, mientras que, en Huelva, fue recolectado en un área de marismas con árboles y vegetación baja. Los presentes hallazgos muestran que, aunque el hábitat de P. crococoronatus haya desaparecido en Murcia, la especie está más extendida en España. Se proporcionan registros adicionales de Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794) y Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775).

Palabras clave: Parhelophilus crococoronatus; España; embalse; humedales.

Recibido/Received: 01/10/2021; Aceptado/Accepted: 01/02/2022; Publicado en línea/Published online: 16/03/2022

Cómo citar este artículo/Citation: Van Steenis, J., Ricarte, A. & Van Steenis, W. 2022. New data on the genus Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 from Spain, including the first records of P. crococoronatus Reemer, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae). Graellsia, 78(1): e162. https://doi.org/10.3989/graellsia.2022.v78.333

CONTENTS
  1. Abstract
  2. Resumen
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results
    1. Key to the European species of the genus Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 
    2. Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000, new to Spain
    3. Other Parhelophilus records from Spain
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Introduction[Up]

The hoverfly genus Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 in Europe consists of three widespread species, Parhelophilus consimilis (Malm, 1863), Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775) and Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794), and a fourth species of more restricted range, Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000 (‍Speight 2020). This latter species has only been found in some localities of South-Western Europe, specifically in France and Portugal (‍Reemer, 2000; ‍van Eck, 2016). Three Parhelophilus species are reported from Spain. Parhelophilus versicolor is the most commonly collected species, while P. consimilis has been reported only from Mallorca island and P. frutetorum from Barcelona province (‍Ricarte & Marcos-García, 2017).

The aim of the present paper is to update the Iberian knowledge of this hoverfly genus which is specifically linked to wetlands and marshlands.

Material and methods[Up]

Syrphidae adults were collected using hand nets. In 2002 the area around the bird hides close to the La Rocina Visitors Centre, El Rocío, in the Coto de Doñana area were visited. In 2003, on the way to the Sierra de Alcaraz, a new dam construction site was visited, which had a flooded forested area with a large pool with decaying shrubs and dead trees (Figs 12). This was part of the newly built “Presa de la Risca”, in the Murcia province (‍Segura Hydrographic Confederation, 2020). In 2021, the Phragmites-rich natural wetland ‘Lagunas de Padul’, in Granada province, was shortly visited in the framework of the ‘Fauna Ibérica’ project of Eristalinae (see acknowledgements). The species were identified with Van der Goot (‍1981) and Reemer (‍2000).

Fig. 1.— “Embalse de la Risca”, Collecting site of Parhelophilus crococoronatus and P. versicolor. Adapted from Segura Hydrographic Confederation, 2020.

Fig. 1.— “Embalse de la Risca”, lugar donde se recolectó Parhelophilus crococoronatus and P. versicolor. Adaptado a partir de Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura, 2020.

mediumimage/graellsia-78-1-e162-image1.png
Fig. 2.— The early flooding of the forested meadows at Embalse de la Risca. Photo from Segura Hydrographic Confederation, 2020.

Fig. 2.— Fase temprana de la inundación de los prados boscosos en el Embalse de la Risca. Foto de Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura, 2020.

mediumimage/graellsia-78-1-e162-image2.png

The material is deposited in the following collections: JSA - private collection of Jeroen van Steenis, Amersfoort, the Netherlands; CEUA-CIBIO - collection, University of Alicante, Spain; WSB - private collection of Wouter van Steenis, Breukelen, the Netherlands.

The photos for the adult figures were taken with a Canon EOS D6 camera, Canon MP-E 1-‍5× macrozoom lens and a Yongnuo YN14EX ring flash placed on a Cognisys Stack-Shot macrorail. Several photos were combined with the stacking software Zerene Stacker 1.04 and processed with the image manipulating programme GIMP 2.8.14. Female photos were produced as stacks of individual images made with a camera (Leica DFC 450) attached to a binocular stereomicroscope (Leica M205 C). Stacks were made in Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) ®, ver. 3.0.4.16529. The map was produced in Google Earth Pro 2021.

Results[Up]

Key to the European species of the genus Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 [Up]

  1. Protibia, at least anteriorly, black on apical 1/3; tergum I partly shiny, medio-lateral part with tomentose vitta; face in lateral view antero-ventrally elongated beyond the frontal tubercle; surstylus slightly longer than epandrium, almost rectangular with slightly curved ventral margin Parhelophilus consimilis (Malm, 1863)

    – Protibia yellow; tergum I non-shiny, entirely tomentose; face antero-ventrally less protruding........... 2

  2. Males; eyes slightly separated, shortest distance between the eyes is medially on the frons; apex of abdomen rounded, with genital capsule........... 3

    – Females; eyes widely separated, closest distance between the eyes is posteriorly at the ocellar triangle; apex of abdomen pointed, without genital capsule........... 5

  3. Metafemur basoventral margin smooth; occiput entirely yellow pilose; surstylus slightly shorter than epandrium, almost squarish with strongly concave ventral margin...........Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794)

    – Metafemur basoventrally with rounded tubercle with long black setae-like pile; occiput yellow pilose, with on the dorsal part a row of black pile; surstylus clearly longer than epandrium, rectangular to elongate with concave to strongly concave ventral margin........... 4

  4. Frons yellow pilose with medial part black pilose; tubercle on metafemur rather long, as long as the longest setae-like pile; tergum III with three yellowish-white tomentose maculae, well separated from each other; surstylus slightly longer than epandrium, almost rectangular, with concave ventral margin...........Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775)

    – Frons entirely yellow pilose; tubercle on metafemur rather short, much shorter than the longest setae-like pile; tergum III with three yellowish-white tomentose maculae narrowly connected with each other; surstylus clearly longer than epandrium, elongate, strongly curved with strongly concave ventral margin...........Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000

  5. Occiput entirely yellow pilose; face in lateral view swollen, clearly convex...........Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794)

    – Occiput yellow pilose, dorsally with a row of black pile intermixed; face in lateral view flat, weakly convex........... 6 

  6. Legs yellow, black more extended than next species, profemur black on basal 2/5 to 1/2, metafemur black on medial 1/5, metatibia black on basal 1/4-1/3; tergum III with three yellowish-white tomentose maculae, well separated from each other...........Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775)

    – Legs yellow, with black colour less extended than previous species, profemur black on basal 1/3, metafemur black on medial 1/3, metatibia only vaguely darkened basally; tergum III with three yellowish-white tomentose maculae, narrowly connected or at most very slightly separated from each other (Fig. 5)...........Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000

Parhelophilus crococoronatus Reemer, 2000, new to Spain[Up]

Distribution (Fig. 3). Known from 9 localities in total, namely the type localities in Portugal and France; 3 additional localities from Portugal (‍Reemer 2000; ‍Van Eck, 2016) and three from Spain (here presented).

Fig. 3.— Known distribution of Parhelophilus crococoronatus.

Fig. 3.— Distribución conocida de Parhelophilus crococoronatus.

mediumimage/graellsia-78-1-e162-image3.png

New records: Spain, Huelva, Coto de Doñana, La Rocina, 37º07’ N , 6º30’ W, 10-IV-2002, leg. W. van Steenis & E.S. Bakker, 2 ♂♂ (WSB); Spain, Murcia, Moratalla, Campo de San Juan, Embalse ‘Presa de la Risca’, 38º11’ N, 2º04’ W, on tree foliage, 20-VI-2003, leg. J. van Steenis & M.P. van Zuijen, 3 ♂♂ (JSA); Spain, Granada, Padul, Lagunas de Padul, 25-VI-2021, 726 m, CEUA00109688, leg. A. Ricarte, 1 ♀ (CEUA-CIBIO).

Fig. 4.— Habitus of Parhelophilus crococoronatus male, Embalse de la Risca, Spain. (A) dorsal. (B) lateral. Scale bar = 2.5 mm.

Fig. 4.— Apariencia general del macho de Parhelophilus crococoronatus, Embalse de la Risca, España. (A) dorsal. (B) lateral. Escala = 2.5 mm.

mediumimage/graellsia-78-1-e162-image4.png

Identification (Figs 4A–B, 5). With all known keys to hoverfly genera (‍Van der Goot, 1981; ‍Van Veen, 2004; ‍Bot & van de Meutter, 2019) the species runs to the genus Parhelophilus. Parhelophilus crococoronatus is very similar to P. frutetorum in having a pilose tubercle on the ventro-basal part of the metafemur in males, an entirely yellow protibia and an occiput with long yellow and black pile intermixed. However, P. crococoronatus differs from P. frutetorum in the almost entirely yellow pilose frons, which in P. frutetorum has both yellow and black pile intermixed; in P. crococoronatus male, the metafemur tubercle is less developed, placed more antero-ventrally and the tubercle pile is arranged in a narrow row, while in P. frutetorum the tubercle is more developed, placed more ventrally and more evenly pilose, not arranged in a well-defined row; in P. crococoronatus, the pollinosity on the terga is more extended, especially on tergum III, where the three maculae are clearly connected, but some of the examined females in this work show how the central and posterior maculae can be narrowly separated (Fig. 5); in P. frutetorum, the three pollinose maculae on tergum III are clearly separated from each other and on tergum IV there are large non-pollinose areas. Furthermore, the male genitalia of these two similar species are different, as indicated in Reemer (‍2000), who figures the genitalia of all four European species.

Fig. 5.— Tergum III of a Parhelophilus crococoronatus female, Spain, Granada. Scale bar = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 5.— Terguito III de una hembra de Parhelophilus crococoronatus, España, Granada. Escala = 1.0 mm.

mediumimage/graellsia-78-1-e162-image5.png

Biology. The adult habitat consists of brackish to freshwater areas with open ground along pools with decaying organic matter and stands of Phragmites spp., in more-or-less open conditions. Adults visit flowers of Cistus spp. Collected from the 8th April to the 25th June (‍Reemer, 2000; ‍Van Eck, 2016; ‍Speight, 2020; present study). Males fly fast on the outer site of the foliage of trees and shrubs, repeatedly resting on leaves for short periods, showing the same behaviour as in P. frutetorum.

Other Parhelophilus records from Spain[Up]

Parhelophilus frutetorum (Fabricius, 1775)

New records. Prioro (Desf. Conjas), León, 14-VI-1987, sobre H. sphondylium, CEUA00017659, leg. M.A. Marcos García, 1 ♀ (CEUA-CIBIO) [as P. versicolor in Marcos-García (‍1990)].

Parhelophilus versicolor (Fabricius, 1794)

New records. Spain, Murcia, Moratalla, Campo de San Juan, Embalse ‘Presa de la Risca’, 38º11’ N, 2º04’ W, on tree foliage, 20-VI-2003, leg. J. van Steenis & M.P. van Zuijen, 6 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ (JSA); Spain, Granada, Padul, Lagunas de Padul, 25-VI-2021, 726 m, CEUA00109683-109687, leg. I. Ballester-Torres, 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀ (CEUA-CIBIO); same data as previous, except CEUA00109682, leg. A. Ricarte, 1 ♀ (CEUA-CIBIO).

Discussion[Up]

The here presented records of Parhelophilus crococoronatus are the first from Spain, although the previous records from Portugal and France made the occurrence in Spain likely. The female reported from Granada is the second known to this species and confirms the variability of certain characters used as diagnostic to separate this from other Parhelophilus species.

The reported finding of Parhelophilus frutetorum at the CEUA-CIBIO collection confirms the presence of this species in Spain, which was known only from an old record of the nineteenth century (‍Ricarte & Marcos García, 2017). The new material of P. versicolor provides the first evidence of this species to occur in Murcia and Granada provinces, both in the southern half of the Iberian Peninsula. In addition, the re-identification of the specimen of P. versicolor from León that turned out to be P. frutetorum implied that P. versicolor is deleted from the list of species recorded from León province and, in its place, P. frutetorum is added to the hoverfly inventory of this province.

The habitat in which Parhelophilus crococoronatus was collected in Murcia is most likely destroyed by the flooding of the river valley in which it was collected as most of the drowned vegetation will have been totally decayed by now. The building of a hydro dam in 2002 flooded the area creating a temporary pool with decaying shrubs and trees formerly found in the river valley. The low water level with plenty of decaying vegetation formed a very suitable habitat for this species larvae. In the course of several years, the valley flooded more and more and the decaying vegetation is likely completely submerged and gone (‍Segura Hydrographic Confederation, 2020). The building of hydro dams has proven to reduce the quantity and quality of wetland areas (‍Talukdar & Pal, 2017; ‍Zheng et al., 2019) and in this view the presence of P. crococoronatus in the ‘Embalse de la Risca’ is doubtful at present. Nonetheless, the other records (e.g. Granada) suggest that there might be other viable populations of this species throughout Spain, however a better understanding of the current occurrence of the species in Spain is necessary.

The habitat degradation is one of the many threats for the survival of Syrphidae (‍Ivošević et al., 2021) and hydro dam construction is considered as one of these specific threats for hoverfly biodiversity. Especially in the dry and vulnerable Mediterranean Region, this could lead to the extinction of many species depending on small streams and its specialised flora and fauna (‍Baffert & Bauer, 2020). Nonetheless, the artificially-generated accumulation of decaying and dead vegetation in the early stage of the dam flooding could have increased the suitable habitat for Parhelophilus larvae temporarily, which needs to be confirmed.

Acknowledgements[Up]

Liesbeth Bakker (Breukelen, The Netherlands) and Menno van Zuijen (Wageningen, The Netherlands) are acknowledged for their company during the fieldwork in the years 2002 and 2003 respectively, and Iván Ballester Torres, Pablo Aguado Aranda and Zorica Nedeljković for their participation in the 2021 fieldwork in the Lagunas de Padul, Granada. Martin Hauser (Sacramento, USA) kindly proofread the paper and corrected the English language. The work reported here was partly funded by the ‘Fauna Ibérica’ Project PGC2018-095851-A-C65 of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. Antonio Ricarte’s position (Ref. UATALENTO17-08) at the University of Alicante is funded by the “Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Transferencia del Conocimiento”.

References[Up]

[1] 

Baffert, C. & Bauer S. 2020. The same coin: hydropower dams and the biodiversity crisis. Revolve, 26–31. Available from https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/re_34_26_33_hydropower_dams_and_the_biodiversity_crisis__1_.pdf [accessed 31 Aug. 2021].

[2] 

Bot, S. & Van de Meutter, F. 2019. Veldgids Zweefvliegen. KNNV Uitgeverij, Zeist, 388 pp.

[3] 

Ivošević, B., Lugonja, P., Brdar, S., Radulović, M., Vujić, A. & Valente. J. 2021. UAV-Based Land Cover Classification for Hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) Habitat Condition Assessment: A Case Study on Mt. Stara Planina (Serbia). Remote Sensing, 13(16): 3272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163272

[4] 

Marcos-García, M. A. 1990. Catálogo preliminar de los Syrphidae (Diptera) de la Cordillera Cantábrica (España). Eos, 66: 81–235.

[5] 

Reemer, M. 2000. A new species of Parhelophilus Girschner, 1897 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from south-western Europe. Dipteron, 3(1): 1–6.

[6] 

Ricarte, A. & Marcos-García, M. A. 2017. Checklist of the Syrphidae (Diptera) of Spain, Andorra and Gibraltar. Zootaxa, 4216(5): 401–440. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4216.5.1

[7] 

Segura Hydrographic Confederation. 2020. Embalse de la Risca. Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge. Available from https://www.chsegura.es/es/cuenca/infraestructuras/embalses/Embalse-de-la-Risca/ [accessed 31 Aug. 2021].

[8] 

Speight, M. C. D. 2020 Species accounts of European Syrphidae, 2020. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae (Diptera), vol. 104, Syrph the Net publications, Dublin, 314 pp.

[9] 

Talukdar, S. & Pal, S. 2017. Impact of dam on inundation regime of flood plain wetland of punarbhaba river basin of barind tract of Indo-Bangladesh. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5: 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.05.003

[10] 

Van der Goot, V. S. 1981. De zweefvliegen van Noord-west Europa en Europees Rusland, in het bijzonder van de Benelux. KNNV Uitgeverij, Amsterdam, 275 pp.

[11] 

Van Eck, A. 2016. Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) new to the fauna of mainland Portugal, with an updated hoverfly checklist. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 59: 187–203.

[12] 

Van Veen, M. P. 2004. Hoverflies of Northwest Europe: Identification keys to the Syrphidae. KNNV Publishing, Utrecht, 254 pp.

[13] 

Zheng, Y., Zhang, G., Wu, Y., Xu, Y.J. & Dai, C. 2019. Dam Effects on Downstream Riparian Wetlands: The Nenjiang River, Northeast China. Water, 11: 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102038